With More Storms and Rising Seas, Which U.S. Cities Should Be Saved First?

Primary tabs

With More Storms and Rising Seas, Which U.S. Cities Should Be Saved First?

           

Lower Manhattan is vulnerable to flooding from storm surges and sea level rise.  John Taggart for The New York Times

CLICK HERE - RESEARCH - High Tide Tax - The Price to Protect Coastal Communities from Rising Seas (27 page .PDF report)

nytimes.com - by Christopher Flavelle - June 19, 2019

As disaster costs keep rising nationwide, a troubling new debate has become urgent: If there’s not enough money to protect every coastal community from the effects of human-caused global warming, how should we decide which ones to save first?

After three years of brutal flooding and hurricanes in the United States, there is growing consensus among policymakers and scientists that coastal areas will require significant spending to ride out future storms and rising sea levels — not in decades, but now and in the very near future. There is also a growing realization that some communities, even sizable ones, will be left behind.

(CLICK HERE - READ COMPLETE ARTICLE)

ALSO SEE SAME ARTICLE HERE - Climate breakdown to trigger debate over which cities to protect from rising sea levels

CLICK HERE - Climate Costs in 2040 - Location Rankings

CLICK HERE - Climate Costs in 2040 - Report - Launch Page

 

Country / Region Tags: 
General Topic Tags: 
Problem, Solution, SitRep, or ?: 
Groups this Group Post belongs to: 
Workflow history
Revision ID Field name Date Old state New state name By Commentaire Operations
No state No state
howdy folks
Page loaded in 0.509 seconds.