You are here

Why Computers Won't Replace You Just Yet

Primary tabs

 

Why Computers Won't Replace You Just Yet

 

 

 
 
 

 

algorithm_limitations_nyt.jpg

 

Consider these two tweets by Al Gore, both promoting the same article:

- "40% of smartphone users connect to Internet immediately upon awakening, before leaving bed. #TheFuture http://bit.ly/WYRz39 @TheAtlantic"

- "Cybercrime market now greater than annual global market for marijuana, cocaine, and heroin #TheFuture http://bit.ly/WYRz39 @TheAtlantic"

Can you guess which one was retweeted more often?

Three computer scientists, Chenhao Tan, Lillian Lee and Bo Pang, have built an algorithm that also makes these guesses, as described in a recent paper, and the results are impressive. (The answer: The first one got more retweets).

That an algorithm can make these kinds of predictions shows the power of "big data." It also illustrates its fundamental limitation: Specifically, guessing which tweet gets retweeted is significantly easier than creating one that gets retweeted.

For more information, see:

http://gadgets.ndtv.com/science/news/why-computers-wont-replace-you-just-yet-552187

 

 

Country / Region Tags: 
General Topic Tags: 
Problem, Solution, SitRep, or ?: 
Meeting / Event Tags: 
Groups this Group Post belongs to: 

コメント

If we are soon approaching the "singularity" (Ray Kurzweil speaks so much about) in which machines will surpass human intelligence in a time of drones already engaged in killing humans -- against the principles inherent in Assimov's Rules of Robotics, should this emergent phenomenon be considered, "artificial intelligence?"   Given the introduction of killer drones and their rapid replication by international war criminals convicted of genocide (e.g., al Bashir of Sudan), what is the human intelligence that will supposedly be surpassed by machine intelligence?

howdy folks
Page loaded in 0.498 seconds.